반응형
" ~~~가 없다면 " 의 의미로, 가정법 과거를 대체한다.
If it were not for
= were it not for
= but for
=without
아래 각 문장을 "were it not for", "but for", 그리고 "without"을 사용해서 바꿔보자.(현재로 해석)
- If it were not for my alarm clock, I would be late every day.(내 알람 시계가 없다면, 나는 매일 늦을 거야.)
- Were it not for my alarm clock, I would be late every day.
- But for my alarm clock, I would be late every day.
- Without my alarm clock, I would be late every day.
- If it were not for the rain, we could go to the park.(비가 오지 않는다면, 우리는 공원에 갈 수 있을 텐데.)
- Were it not for the rain, we could go to the park.
- But for the rain, we could go to the park.
- Without the rain, we could go to the park.
- If it were not for your help, I couldn’t finish my homework.(네 도움이 없다면, 나는 숙제를 끝낼 수 없었을 거야.)
- Were it not for your help, I couldn’t finish my homework.
- But for your help, I couldn’t finish my homework.
- Without your help, I couldn’t finish my homework.
- If it were not for coffee, I would be very sleepy in the morning.(커피가 없다면, 나는 아침에 매우 졸릴 거야.)
- Were it not for coffee, I would be very sleepy in the morning.
- But for coffee, I would be very sleepy in the morning.
- Without coffee, I would be very sleepy in the morning.
- If it were not for my friend, I would feel very lonely.(내 친구가 없다면, 나는 매우 외로울 거야.)
- Were it not for my friend, I would feel very lonely.
- But for my friend, I would feel very lonely.
- Without my friend, I would feel very lonely.
2024.05.24 - [문법 이것만 봐!] - If it had it not been for : 가정법 과거 완료 대체
'문법 이것만 봐!' 카테고리의 다른 글
수의 일치 : 복수 취급하는 경우 (1) | 2024.05.27 |
---|---|
If it had not been for : 가정법 과거 완료 대체 (0) | 2024.05.25 |
As if 가정법 과거완료 (0) | 2024.05.22 |
as if 가정법 과거 (0) | 2024.05.21 |
I wish 가정법 과거완료 (0) | 2024.05.17 |